Between Shiva and Krishna: Finding My Path in Family Life

 In my late twenties, I found myself standing at a crossroad that many face but few speak about openly: Should I marry, or should I remain alone?

At that time, life felt wide open. I had begun to taste professional stability, had enough freedom to travel and explore, and I carried a certain restlessness—an urge to keep life unconstrained. Marriage, in contrast, seemed like a binding commitment. It meant stepping into responsibility, compromise, and the everyday demands of nurturing a family. Staying single, on the other hand, promised independence, the possibility of pursuing solitude, and even the faint pull of a life close to renunciation.

I remember watching my friends and colleagues. Some were married, settling into routines that brought them both joy and struggle. Others were single, free to live as they pleased, but sometimes weighed down by loneliness or a lack of deeper grounding. In one such moment of confusion, I spoke to an elder mentor, who told me with disarming simplicity: “You can run from marriage, but not from yourself. The real question is: do you want to confront your attachments in silence, or let family life uncover them for you?”

That question stayed with me. And it led me to think more deeply: beyond personal comfort, what is the right way to live?

When I reflect on the lives of Shiva and Krishna, I see two timeless ways of being. Shiva represents silence, renunciation, and detachment—the stillness of the yogi, withdrawn from the world, yet holding it together through sheer presence. Krishna, by contrast, embodies engagement, play, and involvement—the charismatic guide, fully present in family, politics, and society, while remaining inwardly free.

For me, and perhaps for my generation, the essential question is: Should life be lived alone, like a sanyasi, or as a grihastha, within family and responsibility?

---

The Vedantic Lens

Vedanta provides clarity through the concept of the four ashramas: brahmacharya (student life), grihastha (householder life), vanaprastha (withdrawal into reflection), and sanyas (renunciation). Each stage has its role. Importantly, the grihastha ashrama is not a compromise but the foundation. It sustains society, nurtures relationships, and supports the other three ashramas.

Sanyas, represented by Shiva, is the pursuit of liberation through complete withdrawal. It is noble, but Vedanta also cautions that it requires inner maturity. Without ripeness, sanyas can become mere escape, a running away from life rather than a rising above it.

Krishna’s life, on the other hand, demonstrates the possibility of liberation within engagement. He lived fully—guiding, playing, loving, even strategizing in war—yet never lost his inner detachment. His example affirms that freedom does not always demand escape from life; it can be realised within it.

---

My Reflection on Sanyas and Grihastha

There are times when sanyas feels attractive to me. A life of solitude and silence seems peaceful compared to the noise and demands of daily living. But when I think honestly, I see that silence outside does not guarantee silence within. My mind will still carry its attachments, and the act of withdrawal will not automatically dissolve them.

Grihastha life, though far more demanding, offers me a practical path of growth. In family life, I am constantly tested. Patience, responsibility, humility, and compassion are not abstract virtues—they are demanded of me every single day. Every relationship becomes a mirror, revealing my strengths and my weaknesses. Family life does not allow me to escape; it forces me to grow.

And yet, choosing family life does not mean abandoning Shiva. For me, the challenge is to carry his silence into my noise, his detachment into my attachments, and his stillness into my actions. This is where I see the path of karma yoga—acting fully, giving completely, yet not clinging to outcomes.

---

Living Like Krishna, Growing Into Shiva

In the modern world, where responsibility cannot be avoided and community cannot be abandoned, I believe the grihastha path is the wiser one. It allows me to live fully, like Krishna, engaged in the world. At the same time, it offers me the ground to grow inwardly into Shiva—silent, detached, and free.

For me, this is not a lesser path but a harder and more meaningful one. It does not give me the option of running away, but instead demands that I find freedom in the midst of responsibility. It does not allow me to escape the noise, but teaches me to find silence within it. It does not free me from bonds, but invites me to discover detachment while living within them.

I know my choice is shaped by my temperament and time, and it may not be the same for everyone. Some may find their calling in solitude, seeking Shiva’s wholeness in silence. Others may discover themselves in society, living Krishna’s joy through activity and engagement. For me, the grihastha path offers the bridge between the two—where duty becomes sadhana, and the ordinary turns into a ground for freedom. The real question for each of us is not which path looks easier, but which path helps us grow into our fullest self.